The RES bonus was already off. The enemy card now greys a SILENCE-format line from the live silenced flag, and the status row leaves the 折射 icon out while silence is up.
The trait line is on every hookmaster and is not trusted. Placement is the loadout at place time: golden 歌蕾蒂娅 carrying uniequip_003_glady may use a ranged tile; everyone else stays on the ground.
Conflicts resolved keeping both sides:
- effectsMeta.js header: the QA residual's "every [holder, item] pair, taken before the first item runs" and "an item
moved during it runs at most once", with the cell branch's wording of what 突变细胞 does mid-walk.
- DESIGN §6.6: the band pick that skips a strategy tied to a switched-off bond and the deployment of the operator a
transformation gains / the bench shed that spares it.
- DESIGN §21.25: PR #2's bench rule credited (the cell branch) plus the QA residual's snapshot-timing sentence.
- PLAYING: the new 突变细胞 sentence with the residual's hammer sentence (revives, borrowed hammers, the lend window).
- docs-consistency: both new tests (batch 6 QA residuals; 突变细胞 after the WA merge).
Step 5 read each holder's items when the walk reached that holder, so an item equipped meanwhile onto a holder not yet
walked ran in the same dispatch and an item moved to a later holder ran twice (latent: no shipped item does either).
Every [holder, item] pair is now taken before the first item runs, as the header and META already said.
A band whose bondIds meet the mode's inactive bonds (gameLogic bandOffBonds,
the same field and rule as the bot) gets a 本局禁用 tag on its card and, in
the detail pane, "本局禁用【拉特兰】盟约，此策略效果可能无法发挥" with the bond
struck through. It stays selectable. In 标准 that is 潘格尼尼, 克莱门莎 and
玛恩纳; no band is marked in the other modes. A test pins the client mark to
the server's exclusion in every mode; the headless check covers the draft
at 1920x1080 and 844x390. DESIGN §21.26, META and the CHANGELOG say so.
The band -> bond derivation moves out of GameData into shared/bandBonds.js,
which tools/build-data.mjs runs per band to write bands.json bondIds
(regenerated with --offline; 9 bands are tied, the build checks the ids).
GameData.bandBondIds reads the field, so the server and the client share
one source. DATA.md documents the field; the test checks the helper on
synthetic bands and that the data matches it.
With the bench rule the gained operator starts the next prep on the bench while its carrier's deployment
is free. The buy loop's pre-emptive bench shed sells the weakest bench single by piece value while the
bench is crowded, before the placement step runs: in 20 solo 绝境 matches on 昆图斯 it sold 44 of 222
gained operators that way.
- bot.js: botPrepEndSteps remembers the chess owned when the prep ends (rememberOwned); the shed's
keepFresh now also spares a piece gained since then (a transformation's operator, battle-result /
round-start grants), so the lineup step decides about it. No memory yet (a first prep, a seat just
put under AI 托管) changes nothing.
- botbench, decisions only: 昆图斯 (seeds 201-220) 绝境 7 -> 11 / 20 wins with the fix (8 on the WA
build), 险境 16 -> 17 / 20 (15); the bots' own strategies unchanged within noise (solo 绝境 8 / 12 both,
solo 险境 19 / 24 both, co-op 绝境 4 AI 9 -> 8 / 36).
- Test: a real solo 绝境 昆图斯 bot match (seed 9 sold its R7 operator in the R8 prep before the fix):
no gained operator shed in its first prep, none waiting on the bench beside a free deployment.
- DESIGN §21.1 / §21.6 / §6.6, META and the CHANGELOG line say so.
With the bots' new band picks the full-match suite's coop/FUNNY/107
reached a 6-谢拉格 freeze board at R12 whose honest +112 谢拉格 layers passed
the flat 60 + 4*round = 108, so the server rejected the client and
re-simulated (SP_VERIFY=all agrees with the client on all 57 battles).
validateClientResult now adds, per bond, what the player's IN_BATTLE layer
traits can add to it: each trait of its units and each one their ADD_BOND
traits hand out (once per operator), up to the per-battle cap the sim
applies; a trait without a cap, or a 魔王, leaves the bond bounded only by
the room under 999. Other bonds keep the flat bound. DESIGN §14 / §20.12 /
§21.26, META and the CHANGELOG say so; tests pin the R12 board and the
capped, handed-out and 魔王 cases.
Official gameplay footage (bilibili BV1vzyVBuEN9 at about 8:24, BV1Qkw1zMEoR at about 7:25) shows the
next prep with the carrier's tile empty, one more deployment left, and the returned equipment plus the
new tier+1 operator on the bench, deployed by hand afterwards. That is the PRTS 备注 read as written
("生效时，原干员销毁，获得一名高一阶的随机初始干员"): a destroy followed by a gain. The closed PR #2 made
the same claim from a playtest.
- PlayerState.transformChess: the carrier is destroyed wherever it stands (board tile freed, summons
removed, copies back to the pool); its equipment, the cell included, returns to the hand first
(overflow temp, auto-merge); then the new operator is gained through acquireChess like any gained
operator (hand, overflow temp, the no-room rule of every gain; no summon card until it is deployed).
The returnItems option is gone (the cell's built-in was its only caller).
- A merge the gain completes merges like any gained copy: the elite takes a consumed deployed copy's
tile, else the hand. _mergeChess loses fromKey / fromDir, so the destroyed carrier's tile never
counts (PR #2 had kept that path; not adopted); audit.js drops its exception for it.
- builtinMeta, ctx.transform, items/meta.js and bot.js comments follow. Bots and AI 托管 deploy the
gained operator in their normal lineup step (no bot change needed; a real co-op round pins it).
- ITEM_RULES note and implFormula for the item card; data/items.json rebuilt with build-data --offline.
- Tests: facing, merge, playtest6-elite-to-board and items no longer pin the kept tile; feedback1-meta
covers a deployed and a bench carrier, hand full -> temp, hand and temp full, a merge with and
without a deployed copy (never the carrier's tile), 商业包装方案's count on the returned item, and bots /
AI 托管 redeploying; feedback1-cell checks the new note.
test/ui/feedback1-gaps.test.js: the 14-bond list from the data (checked
against the official talent when the cache is there), 本局禁用 in 标准, the
wearer highlight, the cards, the 调和 row in the own and a teammate's
popup. test/match/feedback1-gaps.test.js: the harmony mark in the states
and views, bandBondIds, botPickBand over seeds 1-200 solo and co-op in
标准 and 绝境, the fallback, the docs. test/ui/feedback1-gaps.e2e.test.js
(SP_E2E=1): the cards and the popup in headless Chrome at 1920x1080,
844x390 and 756x366.
Step 5 iterated holder.items live while handlers move and destroy pieces: normal 博士投影
splices itself out (the next item on that holder was skipped) and 突变细胞 transforms its
holder (the next item ran with a holder that was gone). It now walks a copy and runs an item
only while it is still equipped on its still-owned holder; the rule is in the header and
META.md. Tests use a synthetic spy handler after the 突变细胞 and after 博士投影.
The buy loop's pre-emptive shed sold the single it had just bought back for 1 (the buy picks
by lineup gain, the shed by piece value). Same-prep buy then sell in co-op 绝境 seeds 21-26:
29 -> 3. Seeds 1-40: solo 绝境 22 -> 24 wins, co-op 9 -> 10 on the 22-match bounty lists;
decision time unchanged.
A catch-up frame or a hidden-tab step drains its events every EV_SLICE (15) ticks and each
batch is stamped with that game time; the held backlog is emitted batched by the time it was
drained at. The render engine then sees a late form fx as late and skips a change clip that
would already have ended (a 转译基底·α no longer replays A_Die_C 16 s after its change).
Merges the 7 WB commits after the first WB merge (d1f8a49..2cb84bd): R3 one of 10 fixed
sets (9 seen), R9 one of 6 boss groups picked by the matches they came in, R11 one of the
7 seen lists of 7; R11 families 14 / 4 / 4; the 机密商店 and the 战术决策 can offer the
same card twice (R11 shop: two VI, at least one V and one 盟约之币). data/choices.json
rebuilt with tools/build-data.mjs --offline (identical to the branch's). The tactic bot
test uses a real seat (the merged bot scores tactic cards on the player's bonds).
DESIGN §21.2 / §7 / §21.20 and CHANGELOG describe the 22-match model.
The user: "战术决策也按官方改成可以重复吧". The 4 official 战术决策 (R11 of
matches 7, 9, 18 and 20) show six cards each; match 7 offers 补给 twice.
- Every 战术决策 card is drawn on its own (with replacement), so the same
card can come twice. choices.js tacticDraftCards / tacticCard.
- R11 (绝境 / 终极, the round of the screenshots; choices.json tacticDraft,
build-data TACTIC_DRAFT): only the ally cards, weighted 1 + the official
cards each showed on. All 24 official cards are ally cards (no 排斥 /
责罚 / 裁决, no terrain card: about 0.04 % for the previous draw) and
列装 / 财富 / 补给 / 整备 / 升华 made 12 of them (uniform: about 4.6).
Other rounds (标准 / 险境, no screenshot) keep every card, uniform, with
replacement too. The weights and the R11 terrain exclusion are assumed.
- The header is the official "进行协同调整，做好迎战准备。".
- Identical cards are separate cards: own index, own object; a pick
applies its card once and leaves the twin pickable; two picks of a team
card stack. Match / bot / overlay already go by index.
- Tests: official drafts vs data, generated R11 / solo / earlier rounds,
a seeded draft with 补给 twice, co-op and solo E2E picks of twins, the
bot, the overlay, and a headless-Chrome render (game-mock variant=tactic
is now the official match 7 draft). Tests that drive given tactic cards
lay them out explicitly. The 奥术 Final Assault test takes the first of
a few seeds whose bots pair two 奥术 players (the draws moved seed 12).
The 7 seen R11 lists stay picked uniformly, assumed because that invents no list. By the blocks of
effectChoiceInfoDict, R11 would fire bounty_hunter_8..15 (beside artifact_paid_4/5 and hardbuff_select),
so the block order is no longer cited as support for '1..7'. 7, 8 or 9 events fit the 14 drafts about
equally; with 8, an unseen list would come in about 1 R11 bounty draft in 8 (open question).
- R11 悬赏决策: the list is one of the 7 seen lists, uniform (slots 7, taken as the events
bounty_hunter_1..7, one block of effectChoiceInfoDict). No list is built from nothing any more;
the rule only completes the 4 lists seen with 6 cards, so 12_8 / 16_2 / 16_6 come in about
1 R11 bounty draft in 15 (14 drafts without one: about 39 %).
- R9: the groups hold 9, 9, 9, 9, 8 and 6 cards (comments, docs, test); match 4's base-only
group may be a draft of another group (open). 58 -> 59 bounty drafts in the build-data note.
- 机密商店: shopDraft.rounds [11]. The official composition (VI, VI, V, 盟约之币 + 2) applies at
R11 (绝境 / 终极, where the screenshots are); the earlier 标准 / 险境 shops keep the previous draw,
any tier I-VI per card with replacement (repeats still possible, about 26 %).
- Tests: R11 slots / block order / never-shown rate, R9 group sizes, the non-R11 shop draw.
- plans each unit with the range it is deployed with (loadoutRecord attackRangeGrid, the grid of the server's
summonRange and the card)
- an attack on every enemy in range (阵法术师 / 轰击术师 rangeAoe) counts double in its DPS value, splash and chain a little
- botbench seeds 1-40 before/after and the decision time (unchanged) in BALANCE.md
- the strip queues by the official broadcast priority (BOSS_HIT 30 > CHAR_DAMAGE 20 > SHOP_LEVEL 11 > ...),
match-flow notices at 25, never cutting the line on screen short
- on a human seat under AI 托管 an item left in temp with a full hand gets a hand slot (a bench operator sold)
Bounty drafts: every 悬赏决策 event is a fixed card list and the draft shows
6 different cards of it, drawn with weight 1 + the official drafts of its
group the card showed in.
- R3: 9 of the 10 fixed sets seen (two new: 20_1 + 20_5, and one with 17_6);
3 x I + 2 x II + 1 x III in 22 of 22. The unseen 10th set is built by a
rule whose III is 10_6 or 20_6, the only two-battle cards no draft showed.
- R9: 6 groups of 9 cards, one per bossInitial event. The 鼠王 group came in
14 of 22 matches (every grey-board match among them), so groups are picked
by the matches they came in. Named bosses no longer always come together.
- R11: lists of 7 cards, the draft leaves out one (matches 1 / 6 / 21 / 22
leave out four different cards of one list); 7 of 15 lists seen, the rest
and the 4 partial lists' 7th cards built by rule. Families 14 / 4 / 4.
机密商店 (the user: "机密商店按官方改成可以重复吧"): choices.json shopDraft,
six slots drawn with replacement - VI, VI, V, 盟约之币 and twice
V / IV / III / 盟约之币, items weighted by the official cards they showed on.
A repeated item now comes in about 61 % of shops (official 3 of 4). Two
identical cards stay two cards (picks by index): E2E, overlay and a
headless-Chrome test (game-mock ?variant=shop, the official match 8 shop).
- render/interp.js isCosmeticEvent: an fx with a form is state, never dropped as stale nor shed from a full queue;
a late one switches the model without its telegraph, its closing clip shortened (render/app.js)
- battle/runner.js: a backlog past HELD_MAX keeps only the last status / skill toggle per unit; a battle that ended
while the tab was hidden delivers its backlog and last snapshot when the tab is shown
- screens/game.js: a new field meta for the field on screen buffers its frames until the view re-enters it
- browser test stalls the main thread (blocking 1 s long tasks); Node tests drive the runner into the render buffer
Player report F2 after 0.1.0: a 谢拉格 taken from the promotion reward was said to use up
休露丝's first-purchase discount. Through real intents the promotion reward, 寻呼模块's pick
and the 拟态物质 / 紧急调度券 / 简易通讯机 grants never touch it: only g.buy dispatches
onBuy, where every purchase counter lives. Regression tests and the META onBuy row say so.
sganggs