The fatal hit on the last 狼影, or a 撤退 while 伺夜 stands, no longer kills the pack. It enters its 战术点形态, the
remake's knocked-out piece: off the fight (no block, no attack, not targetable), kept, its tile reserved, 0 狼影. After
the 狼影 recovery time it comes back on its tile at full HP with 1 狼影 and a fresh 狼影 cycle. That time is the token
talent's interval, read from the data: 25 s on both chess. Until now it came back after the token's 10 s redeploy time
with 2 狼影.
Both packs share this (tokens.js installWolfTacticalPoint): the prep-placed 狼群 piece and the 伺夜 kit's own pack.
- A return timer carries the form's seq and a return cancels it, so a stale timer never revives the pack early.
- When 伺夜 leaves, a standing pack still leaves with him ('expired', no form). A pack in its form ends it with no
return; his redeploy brings a fresh pack.
S1 casts when ready while the pack is on the field in either form, and always pays +cost DP:
① in its 战术点形态 the pack comes back at once with 1 狼影 and a fresh cycle;
② below the cap, +1 狼影, the pack's own cycle untouched;
③ at the cap, the pack's HP is reset to max.
S2 still needs a standing pack: its 备注 says nothing of the form [ASSUMED]. A held S2 gift stays on the pack through
the form [ASSUMED].
fx: the kit's pack keeps 'summon' / 'revive', the piece keeps 'wolfShadow' / 'wolfShadowLost'. Entering the form shows
'wolfShadowLost' with count 0. No new kinds, no client change. Data unchanged.
Docs: DESIGN §5.6 (SP_FULL note), PLAYING (作战中, 自动触发), SIM (token pieces), the tokens.js / kit comments.
Tests:
- kits_alt_t3, new: 3_19 战术点形态 (both chess × both packs), S1 ①②③ with the stale-timer guard, 撤退 / 伺夜 leaving.
- kits_alt_t3, rewritten: the S1 no-pack test, and the S2 auto-cast test (no cast in the form, a cast once the pack is
back).
- kits_t3 3_19 wolf pack and tokens_devices 狼群 board piece: the form, then a return with 1 狼影.
Golden (each fields 伺夜 with his pack knocked out at its last 狼影 while he stands: 25 s out and 1 狼影 instead of
10 s and 2):
- roster-007 and roster-009: the fights change.
- roster-028 (elite S1): S1 brings the pack back at once.
- roster-026 and roster-040: 伺夜 falls before the old return; only the new 'wolfShadowLost' fx moves.
- bond-siracusaShip-high.
- matches solo-NORMAL-1, coop2-NORMAL-3, coop3-ABYSS-5, coop2-NORMAL-8-serverrun: the bots field 伺夜.
Golden results
The simulation is deterministic: the same seed and inputs give the same battle and the same match, bit for bit. These files record the exact outcome of a fixed corpus of seeded scenarios, so a change that alters gameplay — even one meant to be a pure refactor that only reorders random draws, hook order or iteration order — fails loudly instead of slipping through.
tools/golden.mjsbuilds the corpus fromdata/*.json(fixed order, fixed seeds) and reduces every scenario to a digest. Its header documents the families and the digest fields.test/golden/<family>.jsonhold the digests (roster,bonds,fields,matches).test/golden.test.jsrecomputes them and compares. On a mismatch it prints the scenario, the field and old → new.
The corpus
| family | what runs |
|---|---|
roster |
49 battles: every visible chess record (normal and elite) with every selectable skill and module (DESIGN §16), 12 operators per battle on a real stage (all 11 in turn) against the round's real wave three times over, every non-leader enemy kind of data/enemies.json as extra spawns (half of them bounties), placeable summons on the board, every equipment item, band, battle-side 机变 card and stage map card in turn, bonds from the board |
bonds |
46 battles: every bond at its activation threshold (1 layer) and at its top tier (999 layers) |
fields |
22 battles: every Final Assault / Hidden Core leader on a pair and a solo template (shared pool, 200 s cap) and the 联防 field with 1 and 2 helpers on its own map (carried HP / SP, a knocked-out operator, two leakers' enemies) |
matches |
16 bot-only matches to the end in virtual time: solo 标准 / 险境 / 绝境 / 终极 × 2 seeds, co-op 2 / 3 / 4, one server-run combat match, two runs boosted to the Hidden Core |
Battles go through the production BattleSpec path (server/sim/spec.js, as browsers and the server's headless fields
run them); matches construct Match directly with a VirtualScheduler. Every option is explicit, so a change to a
test-harness default never moves a digest.
What a digest ignores on purpose (it does not affect gameplay): object key order, engine unit ids (snapshot ids are renumbered by first appearance, units are named by board uid or def id), board piece uids, the order of client events within a tick (they are counted, not hashed) and wall-clock time. Damage / healing sums are rounded to integers and HP to 2 decimals.
npm test runs the fast subset (the scenarios marked "fast": true: every chess record with its default loadout,
every stage and every non-leader enemy kind, every bond at its top tier, six fields, five matches — 53 of the 133). GOLDEN_FULL=1 checks everything.
Workflow
GOLDEN_FULL=1 node --test test/golden.test.js # the whole corpus (≈ 20 s with 4 worker threads)
node --test test/golden.test.js # the fast subset
npm run golden # the same comparison from the tool (all families, a short report)
npm run golden:update # recompute and rewrite test/golden/*.json
node tools/golden.mjs --twice # determinism: the corpus twice in one process, the second pass reversed
- A refactor commit must never change these files. Run
GOLDEN_FULL=1 node --test test/golden.test.jsbefore committing it. If a digest moves, the refactor changed behaviour: find out why (the first differing value ofsnapssays when two runs parted, in 10-game-second steps) instead of updating the files. - An intended gameplay change (a fix, new content, a data rebuild): run
npm run golden:updateand commit the changed files together with the change, saying in the commit message which scenarios moved and why. - Reviewing the diff: every scenario is a block of its own and every unit / enemy / round is one line, so a diff
shows which scenarios moved and which values changed. A change confined to the scenarios that contain the touched
operator, enemy or rule is expected; a change everywhere (every
rngDraws, everysnaps) means something global moved — the RNG draw order, the tick order, a shared rule. - Adding to the corpus (a new family, more scenarios, a new digest field) changes the files by design: do it in a commit of its own, never together with a refactor.
- A new engine hook, event or chess record does not change the digests of the existing scenarios by itself — the
hook list is frozen in the tool and the corpus is regenerated only on
golden:update— but new data records do join the corpus there (the roster family enumeratesdata/chess.json).