herryyun/ark-stronghold-protocol
1
0 Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
670 Commits 1 Branch 0 Tags
ebbbfe70ef38634847eb8e2f8cf2b0362b03bbc1
Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
sganggs a3a0ddd2be feedback5 CB1: a 复活 (埃芒加德's 命结之秘, M3茧甲) is a knock-out and an immediate free redeploy — 砾's and 瑕光's 被击倒时 / 部署时 layers fire on every revive (community report 「卡西米尔和艾芒加德策略似乎有BUG：像砾和瑕光这种死亡和部署的叠层效果…无法触发」, items 9 / 37) 
PRTS 卫戍协议：盟约 下半/PRTS盟约记录, 埃芒加德 and M3茧甲 备注: "“复活”的实现方式为：受益者因移动之外的原因退场时下次部署的
再部署时间和费用归零". Both revived in place as `fatal` savers, so the operator was never knocked out nor deployed again:
砾 (<部署时> 卡西米尔 +1, <被击倒时> 不屈 +2), 瑕光 (<部署时> +4, 12 per battle), the 卡西米尔 bond's per-deployment ATK,
克莱门莎 / 卡莱莎 and every other 被击倒时 / 部署时 effect skipped the first 3 knock-outs (measured: only the 4th, real
death stacked). Now items/battle.js reviveNow, a `death` hook (M3茧甲 PRIO_RESPAWN 13, 埃芒加德 PRIO_BAND_REVIVE 12,
ahead of 阿戈尔 5 at 11 and 不屈 at 10): the knock-out stands and the operator redeploys at once, free, where it lies
(full HP, SP reset, a new deployment for 坚固维式重锤's lock — revivedInPlace and the `revives` counter are gone). The
ctx carries `revivedBy`, so 阿戈尔 5 still does not count such a knock-out as the member's first (the owner's decision
of 2026-10-05: an operator's own revive uses no slot; 埃芒加德 [ASSUMED] alike, unchanged). 淬羽赫默 S3 keeps its place
right after the hammer's lock (PRIO_REVIVE − 0.5). Tests: test/content/feedback5-revive-redeploy.test.js (fails on the
parent); bands / bonds_core / feedback1f-hammer / op_lessng / op_zuole / docs-consistency updated to the redeploy. Docs:
SIM.md (fatal, death), design/engine.md (fatal, death), PLAYING.md (复活), research 04 (M3茧甲).

Golden: the battles with M3茧甲 or 埃芒加德 whose operators fell — a revive is now a knock-out (deaths count, kill events,
redeploy, SP reset, 被击倒时 / 部署时 effects): roster-012 / 026 / 033 / 040 / 047, boss-boss_6-pair, hidden-boss_8-pair /
boss_9-pair, standin-07; matches solo-NORMAL-1, solo-HARD-1, solo-ABYSS-1.
 2026-10-07 01:56:43 +08:00
sganggs e47b098d43 feedback5 CB1: a pair of colds on an enemy becomes the freeze, no cold is left — the 谢拉格 wind no longer freezes for good from 51 layers on (community reports 「谢拉格盟约冰冻时间没有随层数正确成长」 and 「…被在无法被任何干员攻击到的地方永控」, items 7 and 8) 
PRTS 术语释义 寒冷 「友方寒冷始终需要两两一对产生友方冻结，持续时间取双方之中最高」, 异常效果 COLD 「在特定条件下转变为冻结」:
applyStatus kept the older cold on for as long as the freeze, so every later cold froze again; the wind (every 25 s,
20 + 0.1 x layers s of cold) froze an enemy anywhere for the rest of the battle once its cold outlasted 25 s, never
below. Now the pair turns into the freeze (max of the two, as before) and leaves no cold on an enemy; a cold on an
operator (敌方寒冷) keeps the old rule. The wind alone now freezes 20 + 0.1 x L s of every 50 s from 51 layers (all of
it from 300). Tests: test/sim/feedback5-kjerag-cold.test.js (fails on the parent); feedback3-cold-freeze and 灵知 S2
(kits_t4) updated to the pairing. Docs: SIM.md cold row, design/engine.md.

Golden: every scenario where a second cold met an enemy still cold (灵知, 初雪, 雪猎, 耶拉, 圣聆初雪, 凛御银灰, items,
the 谢拉格 wind) — the pair no longer leaves a cold: roster-005 / 009 / 010 / 012 / 014 / 015 / 016 / 018 / 026 / 029 /
031 / 036 / 040 / 042 / 046 / 047 / 049; bond-egirShip-high, bond-indomShip-low, bond-kjeragShip-high,
bond-maniShip-high, bond-raidShip-low, bond-steadShip-high, bond-suntShip-low; boss-boss_2-pair / boss_3-pair /
boss_4-pair / boss_6-pair, hidden-boss_8-pair / boss_10-pair; matches solo-HARD-1, solo-ABYSS-1, coop3-ABYSS-5,
coop4-FUNNY-6, coop4-ABYSS-7.
 2026-10-07 01:39:50 +08:00
sganggs 4e58481706 feedback5 WY: the Final Assault / Hidden Core leader pool is bloodPoint × the players alive when the fight starts (solo × 1), replacing 「保持固定血量」; 胄's drone share passes 限伤 (from PR #209 by @qingjingshenghuo; the owner's decision of 2026-10-06) 
Ported by hand from PR #209 by @qingjingshenghuo (its one-line data/config.json was not taken):
- server/match/gamedata.js bossPoolShareOf (used by GameData.bossPoolShare and by finalAssault.bossPoolHp for a plain
  game-data object): solo × `solo` (1); co-op with `perPlayer` true × `coop` (1) × the players alive at the boss
  round's start (bots and AI 托管 seats count, eliminated / departed seats do not; at most aliveFull 4; a count left
  out = a full team). The fixed pool stays restorable through config: bossHpScale perPlayer false + solo 0.25 (and its
  optional aliveScaling).
- tools/build-data.mjs: the global bossHpScale carries the rule (perPlayer true, solo 1); the modes' entries keep only
  bloodPointKey / unaffectedByEnemyScale. data/config.json regenerated offline — JSON compare: only bossHpScale (global
  and the 9 mode entries) changed.
- The problem #209 documented: a 胄 drone death is 2 % of the pool and 限伤 cancels a hit of ceil ≥ 300000, so the
  hidden 胄 终极 pool at 3 / 4 players (21.6M / 28.8M) would cancel every drone (432000 / 576000). The drone link is
  a share of the pool, no hit: Battle.loseHp takes noHitLimit and the link passes the limit [ASSUMED: the official
  client checks every damage modifier and PRTS calls it 真实伤害, but which max HP it reads is undocumented]; a part's
  传递 and every hit stay under the limit.

Golden (regenerated; why: the pool size):
- fields: boss-boss_1..7-pair/-solo and hidden-boss_8..10-pair/-solo (all 20 boss / hidden scenarios) — a pair
  field's pool × 2 (two players), a solo template's × 4 (solo × 1, was × 0.25); boss-boss_1-pair, boss-boss_1-solo,
  boss-boss_3-pair, boss-boss_3-solo, boss-boss_5-solo, boss-boss_7-pair and hidden-boss_9-solo now end at the
  200 s cap instead of clearing; the two 联防 scenarios are unchanged.
- matches: solo-FUNNY-2, solo-NORMAL-1, solo-HARD-1, solo-HARD-2 now lose the Final Assault (solo leaders have 4× the
  HP: team LP 0 with 93088–176395 of the pool left); solo-FUNNY-1, solo-NORMAL-2, solo-HARD-9-boosted (its Hidden Core
  too), coop2-NORMAL-3, coop4-FUNNY-6, coop2-ABYSS-10-boosted, coop2-NORMAL-70-diy still win with more leader damage
  (pool × players alive; solo-FUNNY-1 / solo-HARD-9-boosted end with 6 / 1 team LP less). Unchanged:
  coop2-NORMAL-8-serverrun and coop2-NORMAL-14-standins (one player left at R14: × 1 as before) and the matches that
  end before R14; roster / bonds / standins / diy unchanged.

Tests: test/match/boss-hp-scaling.test.js (from PR #209, adapted — every leader and difficulty × 1–4 players and solo;
R14 / R15 leave out two departed players; AI 托管 and bots count, an eliminated player does not; config restores the
fixed pool, the opposite of the PR's test; the plain-object fallback agrees; only the leader's HP scales);
test/content/enemies_bosses.test.js (hidden 胄 终极 at 3 / 4 players: the drone share lands, a hit of the same size is
cancelled — fails without the change). Updated on purpose: finalAssault, balance, bosshp, connection, docs-consistency
(the §20.9 record points to §25.13.4; the data carries perPlayer true), sim/playtest6_limits (the drone share lands
past the line), match/playtest6-bosspool (the 5 % knob halved to keep the 2-player pool's size: that test is about the
pool's arithmetic). Docs: PLAYING §7, DATA, META, BALANCE, SIM, design engine.md / network.md, the §20.9 / §20.10
records, research 00 / 01 / 08, the code comments, DESIGN §25.13.4 and the §25.10 table.
 2026-10-06 21:41:49 +08:00
sganggs da1f5830ca feedback5 WW: split DESIGN.md into docs/design/ (the current rules) and docs/history/ (the per-release revisions), section numbers kept — a pure move: every ## N. block (heading, text, the --- after it) moves verbatim, each part file only gains a title line and a pointer to the index; docs/DESIGN.md keeps its header and becomes the index (a § → file table). design/overview.md §0 §1 §2 §11 §12, geometry-time.md §3 §4, engine.md §5 §7, match.md §6 §16, network.md §8 §14, client.md §9 §10 §13 §15; history/v2.2-playtest3.md §17, v2.3-playtest4.md §18, v2.4-playtest5.md §19, v2.5-playtest6.md §20, 0.1.1.md §21, 0.1.2.md §22, 0.1.3.md §23, 0.1.4.md §24, 0.2.0.md §25. Round trip: the index header plus the blocks in § order reproduce the pre-split DESIGN.md byte for byte (813 785 bytes, sha256 fe81884c…). Tests: test/helpers/designDocs.js designText() (the split script's splitBlocks / designText) reassembles the text in § order; docs-consistency and feedback1-gaps read it instead of docs/DESIGN.md (every pin unchanged); docs-paths guards the split (each § exactly once in docs/design/ or docs/history/, the index row of every file names its sections, every "DESIGN §N(.M)" cited in the repository is a heading — 779 in 327 files today); package.test keeps docs/design/ and docs/history/ out of the zips; golden unchanged 2026-10-06 19:08:44 +08:00