Seen: the Art 教鞭 (杜宾's strategy) drew three 战术特训 cards and added a random one — a documented simplification (docs/META.md
§2.5: a personal choice would need its own phase, protocol message, timer and AI takeover). Official: act2autochess
choice_event hunter_band_1 is a PERSONAL_CHOOSE; PRTS 下半 记录 §法术 教鞭 "使用后销毁，于3个战术特训的悬赏任务中选择一项". The
owner decided on 2026-10-08 to follow it. Taken from PR #353 (code and tests by @Sukvii), ported to the split 0.2.2 modules.
Now: ctx.offerBountyChoice -> Match.offerBountyChoice keeps up to three different mode-eligible cards (15 of 20 in 标准 /
险境, 20 in 绝境 / 终极; one meta-rng shuffle) in PlayerState.personalChoice, m.private only (same cards after a
reconnect); g.choice { idx, choiceId } confirms it (Match.pickPersonalChoice: owner, id, round, index; a request without
a choiceId is still the public draft, a stale id never falls through to it). No new phase or timer: Ready is refused while
it is open, the prep's deadline picks at random before the temp pieces and Ready, a bot or a 托管 seat picks with the bounty
scorer (botPickCard, the bots' seeded rng; at the prep's start, after the cast, before Ready; the scheduler's fallback
picks at random if a step fails). The client reuses ChoiceOverlay (personal: no order, no turns, the prep's countdown) over
a locked prep, the Ready reasons, the mock harness; six UI strings in en / ja / ko / zh-TW. An eliminated player's offer
goes with it; invariants.js flags an offer outside its owner's own open prep.
Not taken from the PR: its §25.24 in the released docs/history/0.2.0.md (the 0.2.2 section is the integrator's), its edits
of the Ready toggle beyond the personal-choice case, its tail placement of the i18n keys.
Golden: coop2-NORMAL-8-serverrun (ai_0 杜宾 casts 教鞭 from R2 on and now scores the three cards: teamLp 39 -> 34, virtualMs
121400 -> 118400, rng shop 511 -> 483 / bots 18063 -> 18070 / meta 112 -> 103) and coop2-ABYSS-10-boosted (ai_1 杜宾: virtualMs
121650 -> 124650, shop 590 -> 589 / bots 22075 -> 22096 / meta 141 -> 154); both first differ in round 2, every other scenario
and family is unchanged; node tools/golden.mjs --twice is identical.
Tests: items.test.js (three distinct cards, the tapped one applied once, nothing before the confirm, a refused cast keeps
the Art / count / rng / uid, an eliminated player's offer), economy.test.js (Ready refused, the deadline picks before
endPrep, solo prep untimed), connection.test.js (two players' offers, reconnect, foreign / duplicate / old ids, an offline
player's pick at the deadline), bot.test.js (托管 takeover incl. the failing-step fallback), bot-smarter.test.js (the scorer's
pick, deterministic per seed, no rng draw when nothing is pending), followups.test.js (R14 / R15), draft.test.js,
unitStats.test.js (protocol), hardening.test.js (invariant), gameLogic / playtest3 / playtest4 (view model, Ready reason,
ChoiceView, actions), mock.e2e.test.js and playtest2.real.e2e.test.js (browser, SP_E2E=1).
PRTS 卫戍协议/帮助 §装备: 「达到上限强行佩戴会改为替换装备：指定一件已佩戴装备替换为将要佩戴的装备，并销毁被指定的装备」,
no exception for the 装备时销毁 items. Before: a normal 博士投影 opened no dialog and its kept item pushed the OLDEST
equipped item out (replaceUid ignored); 盟约之币 and the other consumables kept both items.
- server PlayerState.equip (player/items.js): on a full carrier the consume path takes the pick (replaceUid, else the
oldest) off before onEquip (_takeReplaced), destroys it (onDestroy reason replace) once the effect went through —
the normal 博士投影 takes the freed slot —, and puts it back at its index when the effect refuses (博士投影 on an elite:
nothing destroyed)
- client gameLogic equipReplaces: the replace dialog opens for every item on a full carrier, consumables included,
except an attaching item that completes an item merge and a 博士投影 on an elite; itemAttaches removed
- bots (itemTarget): a consumable whose effect is the same on anyone goes to a carrier with a free slot first (PR #264)
- docs: design/match.md equipment rules, META §2.5, PLAYING 装备 row, research 04
golden (matches only; each traced equip by equip against the parent — the first change of state is a bot's, or the
AI 托管 human seat's, targeted consumable on a full carrier destroying its oldest item): solo-FUNNY-1 (r9 ai_0 随身身份牌),
solo-FUNNY-2 (r9 ai_0 寻呼模块), solo-HARD-2 (r9 ai_0 随身身份牌, r12 简易通讯机), coop2-NORMAL-3 (r9 ai_1 随身身份牌),
coop3-ABYSS-5 (r11 ai_1 随身身份牌), coop4-FUNNY-6 (r4 ai_1 随身身份牌), solo-HARD-9-boosted (r14 ai_0 随身身份牌),
coop2-ABYSS-10-boosted (r13 ai_0 随身身份牌, r14 ai_1 简易通讯机), coop2-NORMAL-14-standins (r9 ai_0 随身身份牌; now won,
14 rounds), coop2-NORMAL-70-diy (r14 h_0 随身身份牌); the bots' free-slot carrier for target-agnostic consumables moves
no scenario by itself; roster / bonds / fields / standins / diy unchanged
Seed 7's solo bot plays 佩佩 for rounds 1–6; with paid special refreshes (96794c5) it reaches level 3 a round later, so
the 3 → 4 upgrade at round 7 costs 10 instead of 9 and 14 − 10 leaves 4. The test now checks what it means — after the
level-up on the curve the bot spends nothing that takes it under the 5 capital — whatever that price is. No product
change; golden unchanged.
The item text 「若已拥有至少2名该初始干员，则再获得1名该初始干员；否则随机获得1名同盟约初始干员」: the 否则 is the
case of fewer than 2 owned. builtinMeta's use_equip_reward_char_chess returned only when grantChess(base) gave a piece,
so an elite 溯光星源 plus 2 normal copies (all 5 Ⅵ阶 copies) fell through to the same-bond roll (白面鸮 in the report's
seed). Now with 2 owned it asks for the 3rd and stops; the item is still consumed. The bots' carrier choice
(itemTarget) skips 2 copies whose pool is out.
Tests: test/content/items.test.js (the report with the normal and golden item; 2 copies with the pool drained; 2 copies
with copies left still merge), test/match/bot-smarter.test.js (no carrier on a pair whose pool is out); both fail
without the fix. Docs: META built-ins and bot items, research 04 / 06, DESIGN §25.13.1.
Golden unchanged.
The buy loop's pre-emptive shed sold the single it had just bought back for 1 (the buy picks
by lineup gain, the shed by piece value). Same-prep buy then sell in co-op 绝境 seeds 21-26:
29 -> 3. Seeds 1-40: solo 绝境 22 -> 24 wins, co-op 9 -> 10 on the 22-match bounty lists;
decision time unchanged.
- plans each unit with the range it is deployed with (loadoutRecord attackRangeGrid, the grid of the server's
summonRange and the card)
- an attack on every enemy in range (阵法术师 / 轰击术师 rangeAoe) counts double in its DPS value, splash and chain a little
- botbench seeds 1-40 before/after and the decision time (unchanged) in BALANCE.md
Sukvii