Seen: the Art 教鞭 (杜宾's strategy) drew three 战术特训 cards and added a random one — a documented simplification (docs/META.md
§2.5: a personal choice would need its own phase, protocol message, timer and AI takeover). Official: act2autochess
choice_event hunter_band_1 is a PERSONAL_CHOOSE; PRTS 下半 记录 §法术 教鞭 "使用后销毁，于3个战术特训的悬赏任务中选择一项". The
owner decided on 2026-10-08 to follow it. Taken from PR #353 (code and tests by @Sukvii), ported to the split 0.2.2 modules.
Now: ctx.offerBountyChoice -> Match.offerBountyChoice keeps up to three different mode-eligible cards (15 of 20 in 标准 /
险境, 20 in 绝境 / 终极; one meta-rng shuffle) in PlayerState.personalChoice, m.private only (same cards after a
reconnect); g.choice { idx, choiceId } confirms it (Match.pickPersonalChoice: owner, id, round, index; a request without
a choiceId is still the public draft, a stale id never falls through to it). No new phase or timer: Ready is refused while
it is open, the prep's deadline picks at random before the temp pieces and Ready, a bot or a 托管 seat picks with the bounty
scorer (botPickCard, the bots' seeded rng; at the prep's start, after the cast, before Ready; the scheduler's fallback
picks at random if a step fails). The client reuses ChoiceOverlay (personal: no order, no turns, the prep's countdown) over
a locked prep, the Ready reasons, the mock harness; six UI strings in en / ja / ko / zh-TW. An eliminated player's offer
goes with it; invariants.js flags an offer outside its owner's own open prep.
Not taken from the PR: its §25.24 in the released docs/history/0.2.0.md (the 0.2.2 section is the integrator's), its edits
of the Ready toggle beyond the personal-choice case, its tail placement of the i18n keys.
Golden: coop2-NORMAL-8-serverrun (ai_0 杜宾 casts 教鞭 from R2 on and now scores the three cards: teamLp 39 -> 34, virtualMs
121400 -> 118400, rng shop 511 -> 483 / bots 18063 -> 18070 / meta 112 -> 103) and coop2-ABYSS-10-boosted (ai_1 杜宾: virtualMs
121650 -> 124650, shop 590 -> 589 / bots 22075 -> 22096 / meta 141 -> 154); both first differ in round 2, every other scenario
and family is unchanged; node tools/golden.mjs --twice is identical.
Tests: items.test.js (three distinct cards, the tapped one applied once, nothing before the confirm, a refused cast keeps
the Art / count / rng / uid, an eliminated player's offer), economy.test.js (Ready refused, the deadline picks before
endPrep, solo prep untimed), connection.test.js (two players' offers, reconnect, foreign / duplicate / old ids, an offline
player's pick at the deadline), bot.test.js (托管 takeover incl. the failing-step fallback), bot-smarter.test.js (the scorer's
pick, deterministic per seed, no rng draw when nothing is pending), followups.test.js (R14 / R15), draft.test.js,
unitStats.test.js (protocol), hardening.test.js (invariant), gameLogic / playtest3 / playtest4 (view model, Ready reason,
ChoiceView, actions), mock.e2e.test.js and playtest2.real.e2e.test.js (browser, SP_E2E=1).
Seen: Match._settleBossBounties banked only the kill coins of the boss field (pp.coins). A perfect-payout bounty (a
战术特训 card, from the 杜宾 Art 教鞭) has its enemies spawned in the Final Assault / Hidden Core like any bounty with
battles left, and used a battle there, but its coins were never paid — SETTLE pays them after every normal battle.
Official: PRTS 杜宾 "<教鞭>：使用后为下场战斗添加额外敌人，若自身战斗完美作战可获得资金" and the cards' "若各自行动阶段就达成完美作战，获得N资金"
have no boss-battle exception. The condition is [ASSUMED]: the team won (the first end the server registered), the result
is a real one (not the synthetic stand-in of a field that never reported) and the player's own field let no counted enemy
through; paid once per player, spent in the Hidden Core's prep with the kill coins.
Now: _finishFinal reads the victory before the per-field loop and hands _settleBossBounties a `perfect` flag.
Tests: clientCombat.test.js (the held 'cleared' result pays once, a duplicate never twice; six eligibility cases:
team win / synthetic / own leak / uncounted leak / forced team defeat), followups.test.js (R14 -> R15 income and the Hidden
Core; a boss win with an own leak keeps the kill coins only). Both fail on the parent.
Golden: unchanged (matches: 18 scenarios match).
PRTS 卫戍协议/帮助 §装备: 「达到上限强行佩戴会改为替换装备：指定一件已佩戴装备替换为将要佩戴的装备，并销毁被指定的装备」,
no exception for the 装备时销毁 items. Before: a normal 博士投影 opened no dialog and its kept item pushed the OLDEST
equipped item out (replaceUid ignored); 盟约之币 and the other consumables kept both items.
- server PlayerState.equip (player/items.js): on a full carrier the consume path takes the pick (replaceUid, else the
oldest) off before onEquip (_takeReplaced), destroys it (onDestroy reason replace) once the effect went through —
the normal 博士投影 takes the freed slot —, and puts it back at its index when the effect refuses (博士投影 on an elite:
nothing destroyed)
- client gameLogic equipReplaces: the replace dialog opens for every item on a full carrier, consumables included,
except an attaching item that completes an item merge and a 博士投影 on an elite; itemAttaches removed
- bots (itemTarget): a consumable whose effect is the same on anyone goes to a carrier with a free slot first (PR #264)
- docs: design/match.md equipment rules, META §2.5, PLAYING 装备 row, research 04
golden (matches only; each traced equip by equip against the parent — the first change of state is a bot's, or the
AI 托管 human seat's, targeted consumable on a full carrier destroying its oldest item): solo-FUNNY-1 (r9 ai_0 随身身份牌),
solo-FUNNY-2 (r9 ai_0 寻呼模块), solo-HARD-2 (r9 ai_0 随身身份牌, r12 简易通讯机), coop2-NORMAL-3 (r9 ai_1 随身身份牌),
coop3-ABYSS-5 (r11 ai_1 随身身份牌), coop4-FUNNY-6 (r4 ai_1 随身身份牌), solo-HARD-9-boosted (r14 ai_0 随身身份牌),
coop2-ABYSS-10-boosted (r13 ai_0 随身身份牌, r14 ai_1 简易通讯机), coop2-NORMAL-14-standins (r9 ai_0 随身身份牌; now won,
14 rounds), coop2-NORMAL-70-diy (r14 h_0 随身身份牌); the bots' free-slot carrier for target-agnostic consumables moves
no scenario by itself; roster / bonds / fields / standins / diy unchanged
Until 0.2.0 the shop kept its old slot count until the next roll (a refresh or the round start), so a
level-up 1→2 (险境: 3→4 operator slots) or 3→4 (4→5; 标准: 5→6) showed no new card.
PlayerState._openLevelSlots (player/economy.js): the extra slots of the new level are appended to the
chess slots (the item slot stays after them), each drawn at the new level; [ASSUMED] the new card follows
the freeze toggle as a manual refresh's cards do. audit.js checks the slot count and that every card
shown before stays in place. Docs: META.md §3 / §7, PLAYING.md.
Golden: matches — all 18 scenarios moved (solo-FUNNY-1/2, solo-NORMAL-1/2, solo-HARD-1/2, solo-ABYSS-1/2,
coop2-NORMAL-3, coop2-HARD-4, coop3-ABYSS-5, coop4-FUNNY-6, coop4-ABYSS-7, coop2-NORMAL-8-serverrun,
solo-HARD-9-boosted, coop2-ABYSS-10-boosted, coop2-NORMAL-14-standins, coop2-NORMAL-70-diy): every bot
levels its shop and now sees (and draws the shop RNG for) the new card at once, so purchases and boards
part from there. roster / bonds / fields / standins / diy unchanged; no engine error stored.
Tests: test/match/feedback5-shop-levelslots.test.js (new).
- Reproduced (scratchpad scripts): on its own field a bounty enemy the 活性源石 alone burns to death pays its
owner — on this tree and on v0.1.4 (all 96 walking kill-bounty enemies, 战场#04, no operator: 0 unpaid). The
loss is in 联防: a leaked bounty enemy re-enters with `bounty.ownerPlayerId` = the leaker (unite.js
planUnite), who has no per-player entry in that battle. A death without an operator killer fell back to that
owner, and Battle.addCoins dropped the coins. Until 0.1.3 the 联防 field was the round's map, so 战场#04's
活性源石 burned leaked bounty enemies for nothing — the report; since then the 联防 maps have no terrain, but a
无来源 tick, the enemy's own drain or another enemy's hit still paid nobody.
- Official: PRTS 卫戍协议：盟约 决策 "该敌人于对应玩家所属区域倒下时，使相应玩家获得额外资金"; the bounty pays whenever the
body dies (the owner's decision, relayed 2026-10-06; 0.1.1 "paid once, at the final death"). No PRTS exception
for 环境伤害.
- Now: Battle._bountyPayee (battle/economy.js): an operator or summon of a player in the battle that dealt the
blow pays its player (as before, 联防 helpers included); any other death pays the card's owner when that player
fights there (own field, Final Assault / Hidden Core — unchanged), else the player whose half of the field the
enemy fell on (Battle._ownerForTile) [ASSUMED for 联防: no source names the payee of a death nobody caused there].
- Docs: SIM.md §1.2, META.md SETTLE, PLAYING.md (联防 rules), unite.js header.
- Tests: test/sim/feedback5-bounty-payee.test.js — the 联防 case (one helper; two helpers by half; killed by
nobody, 无来源 terrain damage, another enemy, its own HP loss) fails on the parent; pinned: the own-field
活性源石 death, a helper's operator on the other half, a pair boss field. Golden unchanged.
Ported by hand from PR #209 by @qingjingshenghuo (its one-line data/config.json was not taken):
- server/match/gamedata.js bossPoolShareOf (used by GameData.bossPoolShare and by finalAssault.bossPoolHp for a plain
game-data object): solo × `solo` (1); co-op with `perPlayer` true × `coop` (1) × the players alive at the boss
round's start (bots and AI 托管 seats count, eliminated / departed seats do not; at most aliveFull 4; a count left
out = a full team). The fixed pool stays restorable through config: bossHpScale perPlayer false + solo 0.25 (and its
optional aliveScaling).
- tools/build-data.mjs: the global bossHpScale carries the rule (perPlayer true, solo 1); the modes' entries keep only
bloodPointKey / unaffectedByEnemyScale. data/config.json regenerated offline — JSON compare: only bossHpScale (global
and the 9 mode entries) changed.
- The problem #209 documented: a 胄 drone death is 2 % of the pool and 限伤 cancels a hit of ceil ≥ 300000, so the
hidden 胄 终极 pool at 3 / 4 players (21.6M / 28.8M) would cancel every drone (432000 / 576000). The drone link is
a share of the pool, no hit: Battle.loseHp takes noHitLimit and the link passes the limit [ASSUMED: the official
client checks every damage modifier and PRTS calls it 真实伤害, but which max HP it reads is undocumented]; a part's
传递 and every hit stay under the limit.
Golden (regenerated; why: the pool size):
- fields: boss-boss_1..7-pair/-solo and hidden-boss_8..10-pair/-solo (all 20 boss / hidden scenarios) — a pair
field's pool × 2 (two players), a solo template's × 4 (solo × 1, was × 0.25); boss-boss_1-pair, boss-boss_1-solo,
boss-boss_3-pair, boss-boss_3-solo, boss-boss_5-solo, boss-boss_7-pair and hidden-boss_9-solo now end at the
200 s cap instead of clearing; the two 联防 scenarios are unchanged.
- matches: solo-FUNNY-2, solo-NORMAL-1, solo-HARD-1, solo-HARD-2 now lose the Final Assault (solo leaders have 4× the
HP: team LP 0 with 93088–176395 of the pool left); solo-FUNNY-1, solo-NORMAL-2, solo-HARD-9-boosted (its Hidden Core
too), coop2-NORMAL-3, coop4-FUNNY-6, coop2-ABYSS-10-boosted, coop2-NORMAL-70-diy still win with more leader damage
(pool × players alive; solo-FUNNY-1 / solo-HARD-9-boosted end with 6 / 1 team LP less). Unchanged:
coop2-NORMAL-8-serverrun and coop2-NORMAL-14-standins (one player left at R14: × 1 as before) and the matches that
end before R14; roster / bonds / standins / diy unchanged.
Tests: test/match/boss-hp-scaling.test.js (from PR #209, adapted — every leader and difficulty × 1–4 players and solo;
R14 / R15 leave out two departed players; AI 托管 and bots count, an eliminated player does not; config restores the
fixed pool, the opposite of the PR's test; the plain-object fallback agrees; only the leader's HP scales);
test/content/enemies_bosses.test.js (hidden 胄 终极 at 3 / 4 players: the drone share lands, a hit of the same size is
cancelled — fails without the change). Updated on purpose: finalAssault, balance, bosshp, connection, docs-consistency
(the §20.9 record points to §25.13.4; the data carries perPlayer true), sim/playtest6_limits (the drone share lands
past the line), match/playtest6-bosspool (the 5 % knob halved to keep the 2-player pool's size: that test is about the
pool's arithmetic). Docs: PLAYING §7, DATA, META, BALANCE, SIM, design engine.md / network.md, the §20.9 / §20.10
records, research 00 / 01 / 08, the code comments, DESIGN §25.13.4 and the §25.10 table.
garrison_123 「<刷新时>若为本回合首次主动刷新…此干员在整备区时也有效」 counts per piece (§21.1). No source says whether a
merge resets the count; since 0.1.1 _mergeChess carried the copies' highest per-piece round count onto the elite
([ASSUMED], conservative), so two white copies that had fired this round made an elite that did not fire again. The
owner decided on 2026-10-06 that a newly merged elite counts as a new 拉普兰德.
server/match/player/acquire.js _mergeChess no longer carries the per-piece round counters (拉普兰德's refresh count,
garrison:SERVER_GAIN_BOND_LAYER_BY_REFRESH_CNT:refreshes, is the only one): the elite starts at 0 like any new piece;
an in-place promotion keeps its count. test/match/feedback1-meta.test.js: the test that locked the old inherit is
updated on purpose (the elite adds +8 on its next refresh, once), and the case "two white copies refreshed this round,
merge, refresh → +8" is new; both fail without the change. Docs: META (counter API, edge cases), PLAYING, the comments
(PlayerState, pieces, effectsMeta, garrisons/meta), DESIGN §25.13.3 and the §25.10 table.
Golden unchanged (no corpus match merges 拉普兰德 after a refresh in the same round).
The item text 「若已拥有至少2名该初始干员，则再获得1名该初始干员；否则随机获得1名同盟约初始干员」: the 否则 is the
case of fewer than 2 owned. builtinMeta's use_equip_reward_char_chess returned only when grantChess(base) gave a piece,
so an elite 溯光星源 plus 2 normal copies (all 5 Ⅵ阶 copies) fell through to the same-bond roll (白面鸮 in the report's
seed). Now with 2 owned it asks for the 3rd and stops; the item is still consumed. The bots' carrier choice
(itemTarget) skips 2 copies whose pool is out.
Tests: test/content/items.test.js (the report with the normal and golden item; 2 copies with the pool drained; 2 copies
with copies left still merge), test/match/bot-smarter.test.js (no carrier on a pair whose pool is out); both fail
without the fix. Docs: META built-ins and bot items, research 04 / 06, DESIGN §25.13.1.
Golden unchanged.
「自选干员放入后模拟中的补给池随机范围也将被相应扩大」: player/diy.js diyStockEntries (every
slotted piece with copies left; the roll's own tier rules, no 调度中心 gate) joins
effectsMeta ctx.rollChess / ctx.rollPool (spDraft rollPool extra + chessOf: bonds through
the player's view) and the 驰援 fallback in choices.js. Granted from the player's own
stock (poolOf). Docs: META, PLAYING. Golden: no scenario moved.
Mon3tr T1 "可以在攻击范围内的地面使用…重构体"; PRTS 战术锚点 特性 "仅可以部署在凯尔希·思衡托攻击
范围外的远程位". tools/build-data.mjs summonRecord: ownerRange also from an owner talent
naming the token, ownerRangeOutside / rangedTilesOnly from the token text. Regenerated
offline: 3 paths (重构体 ownerRange true; 战术锚点 ownerRangeOutside, rangedTilesOnly).
Match: board.js placement class 'high'; PlayerState.summonExcluded in _legal, the
re-orientation lift (+ toast), _roomForOutOfRange, the invariants and the bot; the
client mirror (piecePosition HIGH, summonExcluded, reasons; English strings added).
Golden: no scenario moved.
Conflicts: server/match/bot.js (W4A's comment + W5K's player data view pgd), test/golden/diy.json (regenerated). data/ equals an offline build of the merged tools/build-data.mjs. Golden regenerated on the merged code: against feedback5 the moved roster / bonds / fields / matches / standins scenarios are exactly W5M's per-PR attribution (#160 skill events, #109 deploy-timed lifecycle, #66 灵巧 sources and hidden layers, 83fc408 歌蕾蒂娅 placement), plus coop2-NORMAL-70-diy (fields operators those PRs touch) and diy-051 / diy-052 (events.skill only: Misery's deploy passives, #160); against fb5-merge4 only feedback5's own additions (the diy kits, coop2-NORMAL-70-diy).
Ported by hand into the split layout:
- 83fc408 board.js placeClass: the player's loadout no longer counts, as in 83fc408. feedback5's 补位 rule stays: a
chess the player fields as its stand-in is placed by the stand-in's record (ps.fieldRecord). positionClass(rec)
takes no module.
- 83fc408 client piecePosition → public/js/ui/gameLogic/placement.js: meleeOnHighGround(rec) on the stand-in or
chess record, no module. The gameLogic.js shim header and deployedModuleId's comment follow; deployedModuleId is
kept, still exported and tested.
- 83fc408 PlayerState._placementOf comment → server/match/player/placement.js.
- 83fc408 tools/golden.mjs layout: positionClass without the module, on feedback5's stand-in body (recOf) and in
diyLayout.
- bonds/core.js (6ab9a06, 8a2e0c7) applied cleanly; it equals 13808e3's plus feedback5's i18n toast. shared/highGround.js
equals 13808e3's.
- data/: only bonds.json (the 阿戈尔 spec text). node tools/build-data.mjs --offline on the merged tree rewrites all
15 files byte-identical.
Golden regenerated: 16 scenarios moved, all by 83fc408. Each fields 歌蕾蒂娅 (normal, or elite with HOK-X / no
module), whom tools/golden.mjs now lays out beside the enemy path like a ranged operator instead of on the busiest
melee tile: roster-010, roster-012, roster-029, roster-040, roster-041; bond-deputShip-high, bond-indomShip-low,
bond-preciShip-low, bond-preciShip-high, bond-suntShip-low, bond-swiftShip-high; boss-boss_2-pair, boss-boss_4-pair,
boss-boss_6-pair, hidden-boss_8-pair, hidden-boss_10-pair. This is the list in 83fc408's own message. With the
阿戈尔 commits reverted the digests are the same, so those two move nothing in this corpus. The standins, diy and
matches families are unchanged: no stand-in or 自选 piece there is 歌蕾蒂娅, 崖心 or 见行者.
Ported by hand:
- #109 kit hunks → kits/ops (the tier files stay re-export shims): 宴 chess_char_1_18-utage.js, 野鬃
chess_char_1_19-wildmn.js, 砾 chess_char_2_12-gravel.js, 斯卡蒂 chess_char_3_05-skadi.js, 伊内丝
chess_char_4_04-ines.js, 缄默德克萨斯 chess_char_4_16-texas2.js, 耀骑士临光 chess_char_6_17-nearl2.js. The +/- lines
are identical to #109's tier1/2/3/4/6 diffs.
- #109 generic.js against W5D's own-duration passives (一击即退): the deployment window is computed where #109 computes
it, with W5D's case included. Both forms run #109's duration lifecycle (activateOnDeploy, spType 'none', the
skill's own mods), and W5D's 冲锋号令 DP start effect is kept.
- #103 room.js through i18n phase 1: t('{name}邀请你加入卫戍协议：盟约【{difficulty}】') with the translated difficulty
name (the Chinese text is the PR's), plus its English line in public/i18n/en.json.
- data/assets.json: feedback5's manifest plus #72's audio.bgm.combatAlts (after boss, the plan order). files +3 and
bytes +5 037 595 as measured on feedback4; the hash is recomputed with the generator's contentHash. No other data/
file changed.
- docs: DESIGN §5.6 (#109's timed deployment paragraph before feedback5's trigger rules; "Permanent passive skills are
always on"), SIM §7.4 (both generic passive cases).
- Auto-merged and checked: #149 bond-bar fold (still in screens/game.js), #160 skills.js / spine.js, #109 skills.js /
snapshot.js, #66 addon/battle.js (restTile / isDown live in sim/battle/tiles.js), #150 units.js, #72 audio.js /
plan.mjs, #74 plan.mjs / docs.
Where the PRs met feedback5 work:
- 突袭 (W5L, GitHub #49): raidPoll counts a skill that needs no SP while it is on. That is a passive, as before, or a
#109 deploy-timed skill while its window runs. Once the window has ended only the idle trigger is left. Without this
change 缄默德克萨斯 / 宴 lost #49. research 02 §3.18 says so.
- Tests changed to #109's representation: bonds_addon #49 test (kind 'duration', activateOnDeploy) plus a new test
(window over → idle trigger only), and standin.test.js's 预备干员 PASSIVE branch (the skill's mods instead of the
generic:passive buff).
Golden regenerated on the merged code. Attribution: each PR's gameplay change was reverted alone in a scratch copy, and
all three together. With all three reverted the digests equal feedback5's exactly. Every moved scenario was replayed
and fields the unit that explains it.
- #160 only (0.5 s skill events of deploy passives; events.skill only): roster-001/006/025/049, bond-arcaneShip-low,
bond-emptyShip-high, bond-investShip-high, bond-kjeragShip-low, bond-siracusaShip-low/high, bond-victoriaShip-low,
bond-yanShip-high, boss-boss_2/4/6-solo, hidden-boss_8/10-solo, standin-03/05/08/10, diy-005/006 (普罗旺斯 S1,
琳琅诗怀雅 S1/S2, 星熊 S2, 凯瑟琳 S1, Misery S3 as stand-in / 自选 prototype).
- #109 only (deploy-timed skill state and lifecycle; 突袭 技能就绪 limited to the window; generic 一击即退):
roster-003/004/005/021/023/024/039/041/042/046/047, bond-egirShip-high, bond-indomShip-high,
bond-kazimierzShip-low/high, hidden-boss_8-pair, standin-01, coop4-FUNNY-6, coop2-NORMAL-8-serverrun.
- #66 only (灵巧's aura stays only for a killed member, from its body tile): roster-028, coop2-NORMAL-3,
coop3-ABYSS-5, coop4-ABYSS-7, solo-HARD-9-boosted.
- #109 + #160: roster-002, roster-029, bond-investShip-low, bond-raidShip-low/high, bond-suntShip-low,
bond-visiShip-high.
- #66 + #160: roster-008, roster-027.
- #66 + #109: roster-022, roster-040, bond-indomShip-low, boss-boss_2/4/6-pair, hidden-boss_10-pair, standin-06,
coop2-HARD-4, coop2-NORMAL-14-standins.
- all three: roster-010, roster-012, roster-031.
69 scenarios. Every other digest is unchanged.
The owner's decision of 2026-10-05 reverses the one of 2026-10-04 (elite 歌蕾蒂娅 with HOK-Y only) and follows PRTS:
the line is the 钩索师 / 推击手 branch trait (歌蕾蒂娅, 崖心, 见行者, normal and elite) and every module keeps it, so
the loadout no longer matters. Raised with the PRTS source in PR #69 by @sunstricken (its own change covered only
歌蕾蒂娅; its test page is not taken). GitHub #153.
- shared/highGround.js: meleeOnHighGround(rec) reads the trait without a module (traitBase, else trait); no module id.
- board.js positionClass(rec) widens those six records; placeClass(ps, rec) = positionClass(rec) for every server
check (g.move, swaps, merge tile, evictions, audit, invariants). The client's piecePosition mirrors it.
- bot.js: the existing 高台 preference (a 高台 whose range covers the road) now applies to all six; comments.
- Docs: DESIGN §3 and §6.6, DATA (placement), PLAYING §4, META, research 03 C2, code comments. data/ unchanged
(build-data --offline gives identical files).
- Tests: board, feedback1-placement (each holder with default / no module / every module on each 高台, a 重装
refused, client highlights, swap, battle, bots), gameLogic.
Golden: 16 scenarios moved, every one because tools/golden.mjs lays operators out by positionClass and now places
歌蕾蒂娅 (normal, or elite with HOK-X) beside the enemy path like a ranged operator instead of on the busiest melee
tile, which shifts the others: roster-010, roster-012, roster-029, roster-040, roster-041; bond-deputShip-high,
bond-indomShip-low, bond-preciShip-low, bond-preciShip-high, bond-suntShip-low, bond-swiftShip-high; boss-boss_2-pair,
boss-boss_4-pair, boss-boss_6-pair, hidden-boss_8-pair, hidden-boss_10-pair. roster-031 (elite with HOK-Y, already
widened) and all matches are unchanged.
Fixes the flaky CI run reported in #144: a fixed seed, a free band from the public draft with the pick asserted, and the battle start awaited. Closes#144. Contributed by @CELLOPOI.
The trait line is on every hookmaster and is not trusted. Placement is the loadout at place time: golden 歌蕾蒂娅 carrying uniequip_003_glady may use a ranged tile; everyone else stays on the ground.
Conflicts resolved keeping both sides:
- effectsMeta.js header: the QA residual's "every [holder, item] pair, taken before the first item runs" and "an item
moved during it runs at most once", with the cell branch's wording of what 突变细胞 does mid-walk.
- DESIGN §6.6: the band pick that skips a strategy tied to a switched-off bond and the deployment of the operator a
transformation gains / the bench shed that spares it.
- DESIGN §21.25: PR #2's bench rule credited (the cell branch) plus the QA residual's snapshot-timing sentence.
- PLAYING: the new 突变细胞 sentence with the residual's hammer sentence (revives, borrowed hammers, the lend window).
- docs-consistency: both new tests (batch 6 QA residuals; 突变细胞 after the WA merge).
The hammer lock per deployment for borrowers and in-place revives (both [ASSUMED] where no source decides), 卢西恩 / 锏
casting for an airborne 蒂比, rule 3 for a summon that is gone, the dispatcher snapshot taken before the first item;
PLAYING and CHANGELOG no longer say every debuff misses an airborne 蒂比 (ground-enemy auras and counters still reach
her); research 04's hammer line says once per deployment. docs-consistency pins it.
A band whose bondIds meet the mode's inactive bonds (gameLogic bandOffBonds,
the same field and rule as the bot) gets a 本局禁用 tag on its card and, in
the detail pane, "本局禁用【拉特兰】盟约，此策略效果可能无法发挥" with the bond
struck through. It stays selectable. In 标准 that is 潘格尼尼, 克莱门莎 and
玛恩纳; no band is marked in the other modes. A test pins the client mark to
the server's exclusion in every mode; the headless check covers the draft
at 1920x1080 and 844x390. DESIGN §21.26, META and the CHANGELOG say so.
With the bench rule the gained operator starts the next prep on the bench while its carrier's deployment
is free. The buy loop's pre-emptive bench shed sells the weakest bench single by piece value while the
bench is crowded, before the placement step runs: in 20 solo 绝境 matches on 昆图斯 it sold 44 of 222
gained operators that way.
- bot.js: botPrepEndSteps remembers the chess owned when the prep ends (rememberOwned); the shed's
keepFresh now also spares a piece gained since then (a transformation's operator, battle-result /
round-start grants), so the lineup step decides about it. No memory yet (a first prep, a seat just
put under AI 托管) changes nothing.
- botbench, decisions only: 昆图斯 (seeds 201-220) 绝境 7 -> 11 / 20 wins with the fix (8 on the WA
build), 险境 16 -> 17 / 20 (15); the bots' own strategies unchanged within noise (solo 绝境 8 / 12 both,
solo 险境 19 / 24 both, co-op 绝境 4 AI 9 -> 8 / 36).
- Test: a real solo 绝境 昆图斯 bot match (seed 9 sold its R7 operator in the R8 prep before the fix):
no gained operator shed in its first prep, none waiting on the bench beside a free deployment.
- DESIGN §21.1 / §21.6 / §6.6, META and the CHANGELOG line say so.
With the bots' new band picks the full-match suite's coop/FUNNY/107
reached a 6-谢拉格 freeze board at R12 whose honest +112 谢拉格 layers passed
the flat 60 + 4*round = 108, so the server rejected the client and
re-simulated (SP_VERIFY=all agrees with the client on all 57 battles).
validateClientResult now adds, per bond, what the player's IN_BATTLE layer
traits can add to it: each trait of its units and each one their ADD_BOND
traits hand out (once per operator), up to the per-battle cap the sim
applies; a trait without a cap, or a 魔王, leaves the bond bounded only by
the room under 999. Other bonds keep the flat bound. DESIGN §14 / §20.12 /
§21.26, META and the CHANGELOG say so; tests pin the R12 board and the
capped, handed-out and 魔王 cases.
- DESIGN §21.1 states the corrected rule with its evidence: bilibili BV1vzyVBuEN9 (上半, about 8:24) and
BV1Qkw1zMEoR (下半, about 7:25) show the carrier's tile empty at the next prep, one more deployment left
and the new operator on the bench; the PRTS 备注 is a destroy followed by a gain; PRTS 帮助 sends what a
player gains to the 手牌区; the closed PR #2 said the same (its merge path not adopted). The WA
keep-the-tile rule and the carrier-tile merge exception are withdrawn; the bench carrier and the
hand-and-temp-full case stay [ASSUMED].
- §20.11 / §20.9 no longer count a transformed carrier's tile; §21.20 lists the rule as official;
§21.25 credits PR #2's bench rule; §6.2 and §6.6 follow; the §21 intro maps it.
- META (bot, ctx.transform, built-ins, merge, notes), PLAYING, DATA (items.json note), research 04
(addendum 2, implFormula, open question 6) and research 01 row 7 follow.
- One CHANGELOG 0.1.1 line (PR #2 指出).
- docs-consistency pins the docs against the code (no fromKey / returnItems left, the gain through
acquireChess).
DESIGN §21.26 describes the 变形同构体 pairing list, the harmony mark in
the bond views and the bot's band pick; the normative lines of §6.3, §6.6,
§8.2 / §8.3 and the §21.11 note point at it. META documents the band
pick and the harmony field, PLAYING explains both for players, and the
CHANGELOG 0.1.1 section gets two 界面 lines and one 人机 line.
Step 5 iterated holder.items live while handlers move and destroy pieces: normal 博士投影
splices itself out (the next item on that holder was skipped) and 突变细胞 transforms its
holder (the next item ran with a holder that was gone). It now walks a copy and runs an item
only while it is still equipped on its still-owned holder; the rule is in the header and
META.md. Tests use a synthetic spy handler after the 突变细胞 and after 博士投影.
Sukvii