Ported by hand from PR #209 by @qingjingshenghuo (its one-line data/config.json was not taken):
- server/match/gamedata.js bossPoolShareOf (used by GameData.bossPoolShare and by finalAssault.bossPoolHp for a plain
game-data object): solo × `solo` (1); co-op with `perPlayer` true × `coop` (1) × the players alive at the boss
round's start (bots and AI 托管 seats count, eliminated / departed seats do not; at most aliveFull 4; a count left
out = a full team). The fixed pool stays restorable through config: bossHpScale perPlayer false + solo 0.25 (and its
optional aliveScaling).
- tools/build-data.mjs: the global bossHpScale carries the rule (perPlayer true, solo 1); the modes' entries keep only
bloodPointKey / unaffectedByEnemyScale. data/config.json regenerated offline — JSON compare: only bossHpScale (global
and the 9 mode entries) changed.
- The problem #209 documented: a 胄 drone death is 2 % of the pool and 限伤 cancels a hit of ceil ≥ 300000, so the
hidden 胄 终极 pool at 3 / 4 players (21.6M / 28.8M) would cancel every drone (432000 / 576000). The drone link is
a share of the pool, no hit: Battle.loseHp takes noHitLimit and the link passes the limit [ASSUMED: the official
client checks every damage modifier and PRTS calls it 真实伤害, but which max HP it reads is undocumented]; a part's
传递 and every hit stay under the limit.
Golden (regenerated; why: the pool size):
- fields: boss-boss_1..7-pair/-solo and hidden-boss_8..10-pair/-solo (all 20 boss / hidden scenarios) — a pair
field's pool × 2 (two players), a solo template's × 4 (solo × 1, was × 0.25); boss-boss_1-pair, boss-boss_1-solo,
boss-boss_3-pair, boss-boss_3-solo, boss-boss_5-solo, boss-boss_7-pair and hidden-boss_9-solo now end at the
200 s cap instead of clearing; the two 联防 scenarios are unchanged.
- matches: solo-FUNNY-2, solo-NORMAL-1, solo-HARD-1, solo-HARD-2 now lose the Final Assault (solo leaders have 4× the
HP: team LP 0 with 93088–176395 of the pool left); solo-FUNNY-1, solo-NORMAL-2, solo-HARD-9-boosted (its Hidden Core
too), coop2-NORMAL-3, coop4-FUNNY-6, coop2-ABYSS-10-boosted, coop2-NORMAL-70-diy still win with more leader damage
(pool × players alive; solo-FUNNY-1 / solo-HARD-9-boosted end with 6 / 1 team LP less). Unchanged:
coop2-NORMAL-8-serverrun and coop2-NORMAL-14-standins (one player left at R14: × 1 as before) and the matches that
end before R14; roster / bonds / standins / diy unchanged.
Tests: test/match/boss-hp-scaling.test.js (from PR #209, adapted — every leader and difficulty × 1–4 players and solo;
R14 / R15 leave out two departed players; AI 托管 and bots count, an eliminated player does not; config restores the
fixed pool, the opposite of the PR's test; the plain-object fallback agrees; only the leader's HP scales);
test/content/enemies_bosses.test.js (hidden 胄 终极 at 3 / 4 players: the drone share lands, a hit of the same size is
cancelled — fails without the change). Updated on purpose: finalAssault, balance, bosshp, connection, docs-consistency
(the §20.9 record points to §25.13.4; the data carries perPlayer true), sim/playtest6_limits (the drone share lands
past the line), match/playtest6-bosspool (the 5 % knob halved to keep the 2-player pool's size: that test is about the
pool's arithmetic). Docs: PLAYING §7, DATA, META, BALANCE, SIM, design engine.md / network.md, the §20.9 / §20.10
records, research 00 / 01 / 08, the code comments, DESIGN §25.13.4 and the §25.10 table.
garrison_123 「<刷新时>若为本回合首次主动刷新…此干员在整备区时也有效」 counts per piece (§21.1). No source says whether a
merge resets the count; since 0.1.1 _mergeChess carried the copies' highest per-piece round count onto the elite
([ASSUMED], conservative), so two white copies that had fired this round made an elite that did not fire again. The
owner decided on 2026-10-06 that a newly merged elite counts as a new 拉普兰德.
server/match/player/acquire.js _mergeChess no longer carries the per-piece round counters (拉普兰德's refresh count,
garrison:SERVER_GAIN_BOND_LAYER_BY_REFRESH_CNT:refreshes, is the only one): the elite starts at 0 like any new piece;
an in-place promotion keeps its count. test/match/feedback1-meta.test.js: the test that locked the old inherit is
updated on purpose (the elite adds +8 on its next refresh, once), and the case "two white copies refreshed this round,
merge, refresh → +8" is new; both fail without the change. Docs: META (counter API, edge cases), PLAYING, the comments
(PlayerState, pieces, effectsMeta, garrisons/meta), DESIGN §25.13.3 and the §25.10 table.
Golden unchanged (no corpus match merges 拉普兰德 after a refresh in the same round).
PRTS 卫戍协议：盟约 下半, 3月27日更新#2调整 (revision 439189): 「[Ⅳ阶]华法琳：赋予的特质的叠层上限从 初始12/精锐24
降低至 初始7/精锐14」 — a nerf; the current 参战干员 record says 至多7层 / 14层 and the client blackboard is 7 / 14.
Research 02 Addendum 1 had read the line backwards, so the remake overrode garrison_95's cap to 12 / 24.
Ported from PR #192 by @kukiC: GRANTED_CAP_OVERRIDE is removed from server/sim/content/garrisons/battle.js and from
the client-result layer bound (server/match/fields.js layerAllowanceOf); a granted trait keeps its data cap like a
native one. Tests from the PR: garrisons_battle (updated on purpose: the 7th cast reaches 7 / 14, the 8th adds
nothing), feedback1-gaps (the bound with 华法琳 + 古米), playtest3 (both cards show 7 / 14); the first two fail without
the fix. Docs: research 00 / 01 / 02 corrected (02-bonds.json's note; data/bonds.json regenerated offline — only
miraShip.spec.layerGain changed), history 0.1.1's pointer, DESIGN §25.13.2 and the §25.10 table.
Golden unchanged (no corpus battle casts 8 times in front of 华法琳).
The item text 「若已拥有至少2名该初始干员，则再获得1名该初始干员；否则随机获得1名同盟约初始干员」: the 否则 is the
case of fewer than 2 owned. builtinMeta's use_equip_reward_char_chess returned only when grantChess(base) gave a piece,
so an elite 溯光星源 plus 2 normal copies (all 5 Ⅵ阶 copies) fell through to the same-bond roll (白面鸮 in the report's
seed). Now with 2 owned it asks for the 3rd and stops; the item is still consumed. The bots' carrier choice
(itemTarget) skips 2 copies whose pool is out.
Tests: test/content/items.test.js (the report with the normal and golden item; 2 copies with the pool drained; 2 copies
with copies left still merge), test/match/bot-smarter.test.js (no carrier on a pair whose pool is out); both fail
without the fix. Docs: META built-ins and bot items, research 04 / 06, DESIGN §25.13.1.
Golden unchanged.
sganggs