Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
sganggs 4e58481706 feedback5 WY: the Final Assault / Hidden Core leader pool is bloodPoint × the players alive when the fight starts (solo × 1), replacing 「保持固定血量」; 胄's drone share passes 限伤 (from PR #209 by @qingjingshenghuo; the owner's decision of 2026-10-06)
Ported by hand from PR #209 by @qingjingshenghuo (its one-line data/config.json was not taken):
- server/match/gamedata.js bossPoolShareOf (used by GameData.bossPoolShare and by finalAssault.bossPoolHp for a plain
  game-data object): solo × `solo` (1); co-op with `perPlayer` true × `coop` (1) × the players alive at the boss
  round's start (bots and AI 托管 seats count, eliminated / departed seats do not; at most aliveFull 4; a count left
  out = a full team). The fixed pool stays restorable through config: bossHpScale perPlayer false + solo 0.25 (and its
  optional aliveScaling).
- tools/build-data.mjs: the global bossHpScale carries the rule (perPlayer true, solo 1); the modes' entries keep only
  bloodPointKey / unaffectedByEnemyScale. data/config.json regenerated offline — JSON compare: only bossHpScale (global
  and the 9 mode entries) changed.
- The problem #209 documented: a 胄 drone death is 2 % of the pool and 限伤 cancels a hit of ceil ≥ 300000, so the
  hidden 胄 终极 pool at 3 / 4 players (21.6M / 28.8M) would cancel every drone (432000 / 576000). The drone link is
  a share of the pool, no hit: Battle.loseHp takes noHitLimit and the link passes the limit [ASSUMED: the official
  client checks every damage modifier and PRTS calls it 真实伤害, but which max HP it reads is undocumented]; a part's
  传递 and every hit stay under the limit.

Golden (regenerated; why: the pool size):
- fields: boss-boss_1..7-pair/-solo and hidden-boss_8..10-pair/-solo (all 20 boss / hidden scenarios) — a pair
  field's pool × 2 (two players), a solo template's × 4 (solo × 1, was × 0.25); boss-boss_1-pair, boss-boss_1-solo,
  boss-boss_3-pair, boss-boss_3-solo, boss-boss_5-solo, boss-boss_7-pair and hidden-boss_9-solo now end at the
  200 s cap instead of clearing; the two 联防 scenarios are unchanged.
- matches: solo-FUNNY-2, solo-NORMAL-1, solo-HARD-1, solo-HARD-2 now lose the Final Assault (solo leaders have 4× the
  HP: team LP 0 with 93088–176395 of the pool left); solo-FUNNY-1, solo-NORMAL-2, solo-HARD-9-boosted (its Hidden Core
  too), coop2-NORMAL-3, coop4-FUNNY-6, coop2-ABYSS-10-boosted, coop2-NORMAL-70-diy still win with more leader damage
  (pool × players alive; solo-FUNNY-1 / solo-HARD-9-boosted end with 6 / 1 team LP less). Unchanged:
  coop2-NORMAL-8-serverrun and coop2-NORMAL-14-standins (one player left at R14: × 1 as before) and the matches that
  end before R14; roster / bonds / standins / diy unchanged.

Tests: test/match/boss-hp-scaling.test.js (from PR #209, adapted — every leader and difficulty × 1–4 players and solo;
R14 / R15 leave out two departed players; AI 托管 and bots count, an eliminated player does not; config restores the
fixed pool, the opposite of the PR's test; the plain-object fallback agrees; only the leader's HP scales);
test/content/enemies_bosses.test.js (hidden 胄 终极 at 3 / 4 players: the drone share lands, a hit of the same size is
cancelled — fails without the change). Updated on purpose: finalAssault, balance, bosshp, connection, docs-consistency
(the §20.9 record points to §25.13.4; the data carries perPlayer true), sim/playtest6_limits (the drone share lands
past the line), match/playtest6-bosspool (the 5 % knob halved to keep the 2-player pool's size: that test is about the
pool's arithmetic). Docs: PLAYING §7, DATA, META, BALANCE, SIM, design engine.md / network.md, the §20.9 / §20.10
records, research 00 / 01 / 08, the code comments, DESIGN §25.13.4 and the §25.10 table.
2026-10-06 21:41:49 +08:00
sganggs 575333137c feedback5 WX: the 39 summon models no web dump carries come from the local client (extract.py TOKEN_SPINES) and are drawn instead of the avatar diamond when data/local-assets.json lists them
- tools/local-extract/extract.py TOKEN_SPINES (`--only spine/token`): each token's battle prefab in the
  battle token packs (pkgrps/btl_pfb_tokens_*.ab; the Windows build has all 39, the iOS build lacks
  btl_pfb_tokens_0), the skeleton of its Front (or only) Spine renderer, written to
  public/assets/local/spine/token/<id>/ like the enemy models (sized pma atlas, premultiplied pages;
  the newer RGBA pages keep their own alpha). The enemy writer is shared (write_spine; the two enemy
  models re-extract byte for byte). The skinpack job of 乌尔比安's block is gone: it extracted
  nothing, and that token draws no model in the game (nor do 圣聆初雪's, 酒神's, 贝洛内's and
  予愿安洁莉娜's hidden tokens: no Spine renderer, no avatar in either install).
- tools/assets/local-token-spines.json (committed, `fetch-assets --local-spines`) → data/assets.json
  tokens[id].spineLocal for 35 自选 summons, 凯瑟琳's 爬行号·防护单元 and 凛御银灰's three 风雪之眼; the
  manifest is the same with or without the extraction (JSON diff: only the 39 spineLocal entries and
  the hash). spine.mjs LOCAL_SPINE_ROLES maps clips the resolver cannot read (电弧's 戴乌 C_Skill1_*,
  酒神's 本能的召唤 Loop / End, 白铁's platforms End, 战术锚点 on its Default pose) [ASSUMED where named].
- assets.js spineEntry: a token resolves its spineLocal like an enemy (no web model behind it: the
  diamond stays when it is not listed or fails to load). Scale as the web tokens (UNIT.modelScale).
- setup reports an extraction without the summon models; docs: ASSETS.md "Token models from the local
  client", DEPLOY.md §6, DESIGN §13 (design/client.md), README.
- Tests: test/local-token-models.test.js (new), test/local-extract.test.js (job table, prefab walk,
  alpha merge), test/assets.test.js (the local token models load like the client does),
  test/package.test.js (the full zip ships them), test/static-local-art.test.js. Golden unchanged.
2026-10-06 20:16:20 +08:00
sganggs a7fbc7da33 feedback5 WW: links after the DESIGN split — README's docs table (DESIGN.md is the index, the rules in docs/design/, the revisions in docs/history/), ARCHITECTURE.md (§5 / §6 / §8 / §9 / §14 link their design/ files; the docs/ and test/helpers/ rows), CONTRIBUTING.md (deviations and rule changes go into docs/design/ with the release's revision in docs/history/; 中文 and English), SIM.md (§5 → design/engine.md), META.md (§6 / §8 → design/match.md, design/network.md), DESIGN §2's docs/ line names the index, its parts and the newer docs; citations "DESIGN §N" stay as they are (the index resolves them) 2026-10-06 19:11:08 +08:00
sganggs da1f5830ca feedback5 WW: split DESIGN.md into docs/design/ (the current rules) and docs/history/ (the per-release revisions), section numbers kept — a pure move: every ## N. block (heading, text, the --- after it) moves verbatim, each part file only gains a title line and a pointer to the index; docs/DESIGN.md keeps its header and becomes the index (a § → file table). design/overview.md §0 §1 §2 §11 §12, geometry-time.md §3 §4, engine.md §5 §7, match.md §6 §16, network.md §8 §14, client.md §9 §10 §13 §15; history/v2.2-playtest3.md §17, v2.3-playtest4.md §18, v2.4-playtest5.md §19, v2.5-playtest6.md §20, 0.1.1.md §21, 0.1.2.md §22, 0.1.3.md §23, 0.1.4.md §24, 0.2.0.md §25. Round trip: the index header plus the blocks in § order reproduce the pre-split DESIGN.md byte for byte (813 785 bytes, sha256 fe81884c…). Tests: test/helpers/designDocs.js designText() (the split script's splitBlocks / designText) reassembles the text in § order; docs-consistency and feedback1-gaps read it instead of docs/DESIGN.md (every pin unchanged); docs-paths guards the split (each § exactly once in docs/design/ or docs/history/, the index row of every file names its sections, every "DESIGN §N(.M)" cited in the repository is a heading — 779 in 327 files today); package.test keeps docs/design/ and docs/history/ out of the zips; golden unchanged 2026-10-06 19:08:44 +08:00